Last refreshed
Chalobah → Mukiele
Replacement analysis by price, form and transfer momentum.
Moving from Chalobah to Mukiele saves £0.9m in budget and loses 4 total points on the season. Mukiele currently sits at 7.7% ownership compared to Chalobah's 10.0%, meaning the swap could serve as a differential move.
In recent gameweeks, Mukiele averages a form rating of 4.3 compared to Chalobah's 0.2, giving the incoming player a clear edge on recent output. Net transfer activity this gameweek shows Mukiele at 26,457 net vs Chalobah at -9,864 net, reflecting the current market sentiment around both assets.
| Metric | Chalobah | Mukiele |
|---|---|---|
| Club | Chelsea | Sunderland |
| Price | £5.4m | £4.5m |
| Form | 0.2 | 4.3 |
| Points | 132 | 128 |
| Net Transfers (GW) | -9,864 | 26,457 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Should I replace Chalobah with Mukiele in FPL?
Mukiele has a form rating of 4.3 compared to Chalobah's 0.2, suggesting the move is justified by recent performance. Mukiele costs £4.5m vs Chalobah's £5.4m.
How does Mukiele compare to Chalobah on points?
Mukiele has 128 total points this season vs Chalobah's 132 points. Chalobah leads by 4 points, but recent form may tell a different story.
Is Mukiele worth the price over Chalobah?
Mukiele costs £4.5m while Chalobah costs £5.4m — a difference of £0.9m. You save £0.9m which could fund upgrades elsewhere.
What are the transfer trends for Chalobah and Mukiele?
Chalobah has a net transfer flow of -9,864 this gameweek, while Mukiele has 26,457 net transfers. Positive momentum for Mukiele suggests managers are backing this move.
When is the best time to make the Chalobah to Mukiele transfer?
If Mukiele (£4.5m) is rising in price, transfer early to lock in the price. If Chalobah (£5.4m) is falling, sell sooner to preserve value. Otherwise, wait until close to deadline for the latest injury and lineup news before confirming the swap.
Chelsea
Sunderland