Last refreshed
Chalobah → Tarkowski
Replacement analysis by price, form and transfer momentum.
Moving from Chalobah to Tarkowski costs an extra £0.3m and gains 14 total points on the season. Tarkowski currently sits at 12.0% ownership compared to Chalobah's 10.0%, suggesting the community already favours the replacement.
In recent gameweeks, Tarkowski averages a form rating of 3.3 compared to Chalobah's 0.2, giving the incoming player a clear edge on recent output. Net transfer activity this gameweek shows Tarkowski at 17,634 net vs Chalobah at -9,864 net, reflecting the current market sentiment around both assets.
Chelsea
EvertonFrequently Asked Questions
Should I replace Chalobah with Tarkowski in FPL?
Tarkowski has a form rating of 3.3 compared to Chalobah's 0.2, suggesting the move is justified by recent performance. Tarkowski costs £5.7m vs Chalobah's £5.4m.
How does Tarkowski compare to Chalobah on points?
Tarkowski has 146 total points this season vs Chalobah's 132 points. Tarkowski leads by 14 points overall.
Is Tarkowski worth the price over Chalobah?
Tarkowski costs £5.7m while Chalobah costs £5.4m — a difference of £0.3m. The upgrade costs extra budget but Tarkowski delivers 146 season points.
What are the transfer trends for Chalobah and Tarkowski?
Chalobah has a net transfer flow of -9,864 this gameweek, while Tarkowski has 17,634 net transfers. Positive momentum for Tarkowski suggests managers are backing this move.
When is the best time to make the Chalobah to Tarkowski transfer?
If Tarkowski (£5.7m) is rising in price, transfer early to lock in the price. If Chalobah (£5.4m) is falling, sell sooner to preserve value. Otherwise, wait until close to deadline for the latest injury and lineup news before confirming the swap.