Last refreshed
Chalobah → Virgil
Replacement analysis by price, form and transfer momentum.
Moving from Chalobah to Virgil costs an extra £0.8m and gains 20 total points on the season. Virgil currently sits at 32.7% ownership compared to Chalobah's 10.0%, suggesting the community already favours the replacement.
In recent gameweeks, Virgil averages a form rating of 6.7 compared to Chalobah's 0.2, giving the incoming player a clear edge on recent output. Net transfer activity this gameweek shows Virgil at 20,144 net vs Chalobah at -9,864 net, reflecting the current market sentiment around both assets.
Chelsea
LiverpoolFrequently Asked Questions
Should I replace Chalobah with Virgil in FPL?
Virgil has a form rating of 6.7 compared to Chalobah's 0.2, suggesting the move is justified by recent performance. Virgil costs £6.2m vs Chalobah's £5.4m.
How does Virgil compare to Chalobah on points?
Virgil has 152 total points this season vs Chalobah's 132 points. Virgil leads by 20 points overall.
Is Virgil worth the price over Chalobah?
Virgil costs £6.2m while Chalobah costs £5.4m — a difference of £0.8m. The upgrade costs extra budget but Virgil delivers 152 season points.
What are the transfer trends for Chalobah and Virgil?
Chalobah has a net transfer flow of -9,864 this gameweek, while Virgil has 20,144 net transfers. Positive momentum for Virgil suggests managers are backing this move.
When is the best time to make the Chalobah to Virgil transfer?
If Virgil (£6.2m) is rising in price, transfer early to lock in the price. If Chalobah (£5.4m) is falling, sell sooner to preserve value. Otherwise, wait until close to deadline for the latest injury and lineup news before confirming the swap.