Last refreshed
Ødegaard → Trossard
Replacement analysis by price, form and transfer momentum.
Moving from Ødegaard to Trossard saves £1.2m in budget and gains 45 total points on the season. Trossard currently sits at 1.8% ownership compared to Ødegaard's 1.7%, suggesting the community already favours the replacement.
In recent gameweeks, Trossard averages a form rating of 0.0 compared to Ødegaard's 0.0, putting both players level on recent performance. Net transfer activity this gameweek shows Trossard at 0 net vs Ødegaard at 0 net, reflecting the current market sentiment around both assets.
ArsenalFrequently Asked Questions
Should I replace Ødegaard with Trossard in FPL?
Trossard has a form rating of 0.0 compared to Ødegaard's 0.0, so the form difference is marginal — consider fixtures and upcoming blanks before moving. Trossard costs £6.6m vs Ødegaard's £7.8m.
How does Trossard compare to Ødegaard on points?
Trossard has 119 total points this season vs Ødegaard's 74 points. Trossard leads by 45 points overall.
Is Trossard worth the price over Ødegaard?
Trossard costs £6.6m while Ødegaard costs £7.8m — a difference of £1.2m. You save £1.2m which could fund upgrades elsewhere.
What are the transfer trends for Ødegaard and Trossard?
Ødegaard has a net transfer flow of 0 this gameweek, while Trossard has 0 net transfers. Transfer activity for Trossard is mixed — do your own fixture analysis.
When is the best time to make the Ødegaard to Trossard transfer?
If Trossard (£6.6m) is rising in price, transfer early to lock in the price. If Ødegaard (£7.8m) is falling, sell sooner to preserve value. Otherwise, wait until close to deadline for the latest injury and lineup news before confirming the swap.