Last refreshed
Gabriel → J.Timber
Replacement analysis by price, form and transfer momentum.
Moving from Gabriel to J.Timber saves £1.3m in budget and loses 60 total points on the season. J.Timber currently sits at 15.2% ownership compared to Gabriel's 45.4%, meaning the swap could serve as a differential move.
In recent gameweeks, J.Timber averages a form rating of 0.0 compared to Gabriel's 1.0, so the outgoing player actually has stronger recent returns — consider whether fixtures justify the move. Net transfer activity this gameweek shows J.Timber at 0 net vs Gabriel at 0 net, reflecting the current market sentiment around both assets.
ArsenalFrequently Asked Questions
Should I replace Gabriel with J.Timber in FPL?
J.Timber has a form rating of 0.0 compared to Gabriel's 1.0, so the form difference is marginal — consider fixtures and upcoming blanks before moving. J.Timber costs £6.0m vs Gabriel's £7.3m.
How does J.Timber compare to Gabriel on points?
J.Timber has 149 total points this season vs Gabriel's 209 points. Gabriel leads by 60 points, but recent form may tell a different story.
Is J.Timber worth the price over Gabriel?
J.Timber costs £6.0m while Gabriel costs £7.3m — a difference of £1.3m. You save £1.3m which could fund upgrades elsewhere.
What are the transfer trends for Gabriel and J.Timber?
Gabriel has a net transfer flow of 0 this gameweek, while J.Timber has 0 net transfers. Transfer activity for J.Timber is mixed — do your own fixture analysis.
When is the best time to make the Gabriel to J.Timber transfer?
If J.Timber (£6.0m) is rising in price, transfer early to lock in the price. If Gabriel (£7.3m) is falling, sell sooner to preserve value. Otherwise, wait until close to deadline for the latest injury and lineup news before confirming the swap.