Last refreshed
Gordon → Rogers
Replacement analysis by price, form and transfer momentum.
Moving from Gordon to Rogers saves £0.0m in budget and gains 50 total points on the season. Rogers currently sits at 23.0% ownership compared to Gordon's 6.9%, suggesting the community already favours the replacement.
In recent gameweeks, Rogers averages a form rating of 6.3 compared to Gordon's 4.3, giving the incoming player a clear edge on recent output. Net transfer activity this gameweek shows Rogers at 34,869 net vs Gordon at -23,509 net, reflecting the current market sentiment around both assets.
| Metric | Gordon | Rogers |
|---|---|---|
| Club |  Newcastle |  Aston Villa |
| Price | £7.4m | £7.4m |
| Form | 4.3 | 6.3 |
| Points | 101 | 151 |
| Net Transfers (GW) | -23,509 | 34,869 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Should I replace Gordon with Rogers in FPL?
Rogers has a form rating of 6.3 compared to Gordon's 4.3, suggesting the move is justified by recent performance. Rogers costs £7.4m vs Gordon's £7.4m.
How does Rogers compare to Gordon on points?
Rogers has 151 total points this season vs Gordon's 101 points. Rogers leads by 50 points overall.
Is Rogers worth the price over Gordon?
Rogers costs £7.4m while Gordon costs £7.4m — a difference of £0.0m. You save £0.0m which could fund upgrades elsewhere.
What are the transfer trends for Gordon and Rogers?
Gordon has a net transfer flow of -23,509 this gameweek, while Rogers has 34,869 net transfers. Positive momentum for Rogers suggests managers are backing this move.
When is the best time to make the Gordon to Rogers transfer?
If Rogers (£7.4m) is rising in price, transfer early to lock in the price. If Gordon (£7.4m) is falling, sell sooner to preserve value. Otherwise, wait until close to deadline for the latest injury and lineup news before confirming the swap.