Last refreshed
Hill → N.Williams
Replacement analysis by price, form and transfer momentum.
Moving from Hill to N.Williams costs an extra £0.6m and gains 28 total points on the season. N.Williams currently sits at 4.3% ownership compared to Hill's 8.4%, meaning the swap could serve as a differential move.
In recent gameweeks, N.Williams averages a form rating of 9.3 compared to Hill's 2.3, giving the incoming player a clear edge on recent output. Net transfer activity this gameweek shows N.Williams at 19,649 net vs Hill at -12,930 net, reflecting the current market sentiment around both assets.
| Metric | Hill | N.Williams |
|---|---|---|
| Club |  Bournemouth |  Nott'm Forest |
| Price | £4.2m | £4.8m |
| Form | 2.3 | 9.3 |
| Points | 89 | 117 |
| Net Transfers (GW) | -12,930 | 19,649 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Should I replace Hill with N.Williams in FPL?
N.Williams has a form rating of 9.3 compared to Hill's 2.3, suggesting the move is justified by recent performance. N.Williams costs £4.8m vs Hill's £4.2m.
How does N.Williams compare to Hill on points?
N.Williams has 117 total points this season vs Hill's 89 points. N.Williams leads by 28 points overall.
Is N.Williams worth the price over Hill?
N.Williams costs £4.8m while Hill costs £4.2m — a difference of £0.6m. The upgrade costs extra budget but N.Williams delivers 117 season points.
What are the transfer trends for Hill and N.Williams?
Hill has a net transfer flow of -12,930 this gameweek, while N.Williams has 19,649 net transfers. Positive momentum for N.Williams suggests managers are backing this move.
When is the best time to make the Hill to N.Williams transfer?
If N.Williams (£4.8m) is rising in price, transfer early to lock in the price. If Hill (£4.2m) is falling, sell sooner to preserve value. Otherwise, wait until close to deadline for the latest injury and lineup news before confirming the swap.