Last refreshed
J.Timber → Mukiele
Replacement analysis by price, form and transfer momentum.
Moving from J.Timber to Mukiele saves £1.7m in budget and loses 21 total points on the season. Mukiele currently sits at 7.7% ownership compared to J.Timber's 21.5%, meaning the swap could serve as a differential move.
In recent gameweeks, Mukiele averages a form rating of 4.3 compared to J.Timber's 0.0, giving the incoming player a clear edge on recent output. Net transfer activity this gameweek shows Mukiele at 26,457 net vs J.Timber at -25,928 net, reflecting the current market sentiment around both assets.
| Metric | J.Timber | Mukiele |
|---|---|---|
| Club |  Arsenal |  Sunderland |
| Price | £6.2m | £4.5m |
| Form | 0.0 | 4.3 |
| Points | 149 | 128 |
| Net Transfers (GW) | -25,928 | 26,457 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Should I replace J.Timber with Mukiele in FPL?
Mukiele has a form rating of 4.3 compared to J.Timber's 0.0, suggesting the move is justified by recent performance. Mukiele costs £4.5m vs J.Timber's £6.2m.
How does Mukiele compare to J.Timber on points?
Mukiele has 128 total points this season vs J.Timber's 149 points. J.Timber leads by 21 points, but recent form may tell a different story.
Is Mukiele worth the price over J.Timber?
Mukiele costs £4.5m while J.Timber costs £6.2m — a difference of £1.7m. You save £1.7m which could fund upgrades elsewhere.
What are the transfer trends for J.Timber and Mukiele?
J.Timber has a net transfer flow of -25,928 this gameweek, while Mukiele has 26,457 net transfers. Positive momentum for Mukiele suggests managers are backing this move.
When is the best time to make the J.Timber to Mukiele transfer?
If Mukiele (£4.5m) is rising in price, transfer early to lock in the price. If J.Timber (£6.2m) is falling, sell sooner to preserve value. Otherwise, wait until close to deadline for the latest injury and lineup news before confirming the swap.