Last refreshed
J.Timber → Tarkowski
Replacement analysis by price, form and transfer momentum.
Moving from J.Timber to Tarkowski saves £0.5m in budget and loses 3 total points on the season. Tarkowski currently sits at 12.0% ownership compared to J.Timber's 21.5%, meaning the swap could serve as a differential move.
In recent gameweeks, Tarkowski averages a form rating of 3.3 compared to J.Timber's 0.0, giving the incoming player a clear edge on recent output. Net transfer activity this gameweek shows Tarkowski at 17,634 net vs J.Timber at -25,928 net, reflecting the current market sentiment around both assets.
Arsenal
EvertonFrequently Asked Questions
Should I replace J.Timber with Tarkowski in FPL?
Tarkowski has a form rating of 3.3 compared to J.Timber's 0.0, suggesting the move is justified by recent performance. Tarkowski costs £5.7m vs J.Timber's £6.2m.
How does Tarkowski compare to J.Timber on points?
Tarkowski has 146 total points this season vs J.Timber's 149 points. J.Timber leads by 3 points, but recent form may tell a different story.
Is Tarkowski worth the price over J.Timber?
Tarkowski costs £5.7m while J.Timber costs £6.2m — a difference of £0.5m. You save £0.5m which could fund upgrades elsewhere.
What are the transfer trends for J.Timber and Tarkowski?
J.Timber has a net transfer flow of -25,928 this gameweek, while Tarkowski has 17,634 net transfers. Positive momentum for Tarkowski suggests managers are backing this move.
When is the best time to make the J.Timber to Tarkowski transfer?
If Tarkowski (£5.7m) is rising in price, transfer early to lock in the price. If J.Timber (£6.2m) is falling, sell sooner to preserve value. Otherwise, wait until close to deadline for the latest injury and lineup news before confirming the swap.