Last refreshed
Martinelli → Ødegaard
Replacement analysis by price, form and transfer momentum.
Moving from Martinelli to Ødegaard costs an extra £1.0m and gains 17 total points on the season. Ødegaard currently sits at 1.7% ownership compared to Martinelli's 0.9%, suggesting the community already favours the replacement.
In recent gameweeks, Ødegaard averages a form rating of 0.0 compared to Martinelli's 7.0, so the outgoing player actually has stronger recent returns — consider whether fixtures justify the move. Net transfer activity this gameweek shows Ødegaard at 0 net vs Martinelli at 0 net, reflecting the current market sentiment around both assets.
| Metric | Martinelli | Ødegaard |
|---|---|---|
| Club |  Arsenal | Arsenal |
| Price | £6.8m | £7.8m |
| Form | 7.0 | 0.0 |
| Points | 57 | 74 |
| Net Transfers (GW) | 0 | 0 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Should I replace Martinelli with Ødegaard in FPL?
Ødegaard has a form rating of 0.0 compared to Martinelli's 7.0, so the form difference is marginal — consider fixtures and upcoming blanks before moving. Ødegaard costs £7.8m vs Martinelli's £6.8m.
How does Ødegaard compare to Martinelli on points?
Ødegaard has 74 total points this season vs Martinelli's 57 points. Ødegaard leads by 17 points overall.
Is Ødegaard worth the price over Martinelli?
Ødegaard costs £7.8m while Martinelli costs £6.8m — a difference of £1.0m. The upgrade costs extra budget but Ødegaard delivers 74 season points.
What are the transfer trends for Martinelli and Ødegaard?
Martinelli has a net transfer flow of 0 this gameweek, while Ødegaard has 0 net transfers. Transfer activity for Ødegaard is mixed — do your own fixture analysis.
When is the best time to make the Martinelli to Ødegaard transfer?
If Ødegaard (£7.8m) is rising in price, transfer early to lock in the price. If Martinelli (£6.8m) is falling, sell sooner to preserve value. Otherwise, wait until close to deadline for the latest injury and lineup news before confirming the swap.