Last refreshed
Nichols → Cash
Replacement analysis by price, form and transfer momentum.
Moving from Nichols to Cash costs an extra £0.9m and gains 117 total points on the season. Cash currently sits at 7.4% ownership compared to Nichols's 0.2%, suggesting the community already favours the replacement.
In recent gameweeks, Cash averages a form rating of 1.0 compared to Nichols's 0.0, giving the incoming player a clear edge on recent output. Net transfer activity this gameweek shows Cash at 0 net vs Nichols at 0 net, reflecting the current market sentiment around both assets.
| Metric | Nichols | Cash |
|---|---|---|
| Club |  Arsenal |  Aston Villa |
| Price | £3.7m | £4.6m |
| Form | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Points | 0 | 117 |
| Net Transfers (GW) | 0 | 0 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Should I replace Nichols with Cash in FPL?
Cash has a form rating of 1.0 compared to Nichols's 0.0, suggesting the move is justified by recent performance. Cash costs £4.6m vs Nichols's £3.7m.
How does Cash compare to Nichols on points?
Cash has 117 total points this season vs Nichols's 0 points. Cash leads by 117 points overall.
Is Cash worth the price over Nichols?
Cash costs £4.6m while Nichols costs £3.7m — a difference of £0.9m. The upgrade costs extra budget but Cash delivers 117 season points.
What are the transfer trends for Nichols and Cash?
Nichols has a net transfer flow of 0 this gameweek, while Cash has 0 net transfers. Transfer activity for Cash is mixed — do your own fixture analysis.
When is the best time to make the Nichols to Cash transfer?
If Cash (£4.6m) is rising in price, transfer early to lock in the price. If Nichols (£3.7m) is falling, sell sooner to preserve value. Otherwise, wait until close to deadline for the latest injury and lineup news before confirming the swap.