Last refreshed
Saka → Ødegaard
Replacement analysis by price, form and transfer momentum.
Moving from Saka to Ødegaard saves £2.2m in budget and loses 83 total points on the season. Ødegaard currently sits at 1.7% ownership compared to Saka's 11.6%, meaning the swap could serve as a differential move.
In recent gameweeks, Ødegaard averages a form rating of 0.0 compared to Saka's 0.0, putting both players level on recent performance. Net transfer activity this gameweek shows Ødegaard at 0 net vs Saka at 0 net, reflecting the current market sentiment around both assets.
ArsenalFrequently Asked Questions
Should I replace Saka with Ødegaard in FPL?
Ødegaard has a form rating of 0.0 compared to Saka's 0.0, so the form difference is marginal — consider fixtures and upcoming blanks before moving. Ødegaard costs £7.8m vs Saka's £10.0m.
How does Ødegaard compare to Saka on points?
Ødegaard has 74 total points this season vs Saka's 157 points. Saka leads by 83 points, but recent form may tell a different story.
Is Ødegaard worth the price over Saka?
Ødegaard costs £7.8m while Saka costs £10.0m — a difference of £2.2m. You save £2.2m which could fund upgrades elsewhere.
What are the transfer trends for Saka and Ødegaard?
Saka has a net transfer flow of 0 this gameweek, while Ødegaard has 0 net transfers. Transfer activity for Ødegaard is mixed — do your own fixture analysis.
When is the best time to make the Saka to Ødegaard transfer?
If Ødegaard (£7.8m) is rising in price, transfer early to lock in the price. If Saka (£10.0m) is falling, sell sooner to preserve value. Otherwise, wait until close to deadline for the latest injury and lineup news before confirming the swap.