Last refreshed
Scott → Okafor
Replacement analysis by price, form and transfer momentum.
Moving from Scott to Okafor costs an extra £0.4m and loses 24 total points on the season. Okafor currently sits at 1.4% ownership compared to Scott's 3.3%, meaning the swap could serve as a differential move.
In recent gameweeks, Okafor averages a form rating of 7.5 compared to Scott's 4.3, giving the incoming player a clear edge on recent output. Net transfer activity this gameweek shows Okafor at 9,365 net vs Scott at -10,390 net, reflecting the current market sentiment around both assets.
| Metric | Scott | Okafor |
|---|---|---|
| Club |  Bournemouth |  Leeds |
| Price | £5.1m | £5.5m |
| Form | 4.3 | 7.5 |
| Points | 121 | 97 |
| Net Transfers (GW) | -10,390 | 9,365 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Should I replace Scott with Okafor in FPL?
Okafor has a form rating of 7.5 compared to Scott's 4.3, suggesting the move is justified by recent performance. Okafor costs £5.5m vs Scott's £5.1m.
How does Okafor compare to Scott on points?
Okafor has 97 total points this season vs Scott's 121 points. Scott leads by 24 points, but recent form may tell a different story.
Is Okafor worth the price over Scott?
Okafor costs £5.5m while Scott costs £5.1m — a difference of £0.4m. The upgrade costs extra budget but Okafor delivers 97 season points.
What are the transfer trends for Scott and Okafor?
Scott has a net transfer flow of -10,390 this gameweek, while Okafor has 9,365 net transfers. Positive momentum for Okafor suggests managers are backing this move.
When is the best time to make the Scott to Okafor transfer?
If Okafor (£5.5m) is rising in price, transfer early to lock in the price. If Scott (£5.1m) is falling, sell sooner to preserve value. Otherwise, wait until close to deadline for the latest injury and lineup news before confirming the swap.