Last refreshed
Gibbs-White → Ødegaard
Replacement analysis by price, form and transfer momentum.
Moving from Gibbs-White to Ødegaard saves £1.5m in budget and gains 9 total points on the season. Ødegaard currently sits at 9.6% ownership compared to Gibbs-White's 11.3%, meaning the swap could serve as a differential move.
In recent gameweeks, Ødegaard averages a form rating of 11.0 compared to Gibbs-White's 2.0, giving the incoming player a clear edge on recent output. Net transfer activity this gameweek shows Ødegaard at 92,757 net vs Gibbs-White at -27,257 net, reflecting the current market sentiment around both assets.
| Metric | Gibbs-White | Ødegaard |
|---|---|---|
| Club |  Nott'm Forest |  Arsenal |
| Price | £8.0m | £6.5m |
| Form | 2.0 | 11.0 |
| Points | 2 | 11 |
| Net Transfers (GW) | -27,257 | 92,757 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Should I replace Gibbs-White with Ødegaard in FPL?
Ødegaard has a form rating of 11.0 compared to Gibbs-White's 2.0, suggesting the move is justified by recent performance. Ødegaard costs £6.5m vs Gibbs-White's £8.0m.
How does Ødegaard compare to Gibbs-White on points?
Ødegaard has 11 total points this season vs Gibbs-White's 2 points. Ødegaard leads by 9 points overall.
Is Ødegaard worth the price over Gibbs-White?
Ødegaard costs £6.5m while Gibbs-White costs £8.0m — a difference of £1.5m. You save £1.5m which could fund upgrades elsewhere.
What are the transfer trends for Gibbs-White and Ødegaard?
Gibbs-White has a net transfer flow of -27,257 this gameweek, while Ødegaard has 92,757 net transfers. Positive momentum for Ødegaard suggests managers are backing this move.
When is the best time to make the Gibbs-White to Ødegaard transfer?
If Ødegaard (£6.5m) is rising in price, transfer early to lock in the price. If Gibbs-White (£8.0m) is falling, sell sooner to preserve value. Otherwise, wait until close to deadline for the latest injury and lineup news before confirming the swap.