Last refreshed
Gibbs-White → Groß
Replacement analysis by price, form and transfer momentum.
Moving from Gibbs-White to Groß saves £2.1m in budget and gains 19 total points on the season. Groß currently sits at 30.4% ownership compared to Gibbs-White's 15.7%, suggesting the community already favours the replacement.
In recent gameweeks, Groß averages a form rating of 15.5 compared to Gibbs-White's 5.0, giving the incoming player a clear edge on recent output. Net transfer activity this gameweek shows Groß at 922,563 net vs Gibbs-White at -19,165 net, reflecting the current market sentiment around both assets.
| Metric | Gibbs-White | Groß |
|---|---|---|
| Club | Nott'm Forest | Brighton |
| Price | £8.0m | £5.9m |
| Form | 5.0 | 15.5 |
| Points | 28 | 47 |
| Net Transfers (GW) | -19,165 | 922,563 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Should I replace Gibbs-White with Groß in FPL?
Groß has a form rating of 15.5 compared to Gibbs-White's 5.0, suggesting the move is justified by recent performance. Groß costs £5.9m vs Gibbs-White's £8.0m.
How does Groß compare to Gibbs-White on points?
Groß has 47 total points this season vs Gibbs-White's 28 points. Groß leads by 19 points overall.
Is Groß worth the price over Gibbs-White?
Groß costs £5.9m while Gibbs-White costs £8.0m — a difference of £2.1m. You save £2.1m which could fund upgrades elsewhere.
What are the transfer trends for Gibbs-White and Groß?
Gibbs-White has a net transfer flow of -19,165 this gameweek, while Groß has 922,563 net transfers. Positive momentum for Groß suggests managers are backing this move.
When is the best time to make the Gibbs-White to Groß transfer?
If Groß (£5.9m) is rising in price, transfer early to lock in the price. If Gibbs-White (£8.0m) is falling, sell sooner to preserve value. Otherwise, wait until close to deadline for the latest injury and lineup news before confirming the swap.
Nott'm Forest
Brighton