Last refreshed
Gibbs-White → Rogers
Replacement analysis by price, form and transfer momentum.
Moving from Gibbs-White to Rogers saves £0.2m in budget and gains 1 total points on the season. Rogers currently sits at 41.1% ownership compared to Gibbs-White's 15.7%, suggesting the community already favours the replacement.
In recent gameweeks, Rogers averages a form rating of 5.0 compared to Gibbs-White's 5.0, putting both players level on recent performance. Net transfer activity this gameweek shows Rogers at 139,394 net vs Gibbs-White at -19,165 net, reflecting the current market sentiment around both assets.
| Metric | Gibbs-White | Rogers |
|---|---|---|
| Club |  Nott'm Forest |  Chelsea |
| Price | £8.0m | £7.8m |
| Form | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Points | 28 | 29 |
| Net Transfers (GW) | -19,165 | 139,394 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Should I replace Gibbs-White with Rogers in FPL?
Rogers has a form rating of 5.0 compared to Gibbs-White's 5.0, so the form difference is marginal — consider fixtures and upcoming blanks before moving. Rogers costs £7.8m vs Gibbs-White's £8.0m.
How does Rogers compare to Gibbs-White on points?
Rogers has 29 total points this season vs Gibbs-White's 28 points. Rogers leads by 1 points overall.
Is Rogers worth the price over Gibbs-White?
Rogers costs £7.8m while Gibbs-White costs £8.0m — a difference of £0.2m. You save £0.2m which could fund upgrades elsewhere.
What are the transfer trends for Gibbs-White and Rogers?
Gibbs-White has a net transfer flow of -19,165 this gameweek, while Rogers has 139,394 net transfers. Positive momentum for Rogers suggests managers are backing this move.
When is the best time to make the Gibbs-White to Rogers transfer?
If Rogers (£7.8m) is rising in price, transfer early to lock in the price. If Gibbs-White (£8.0m) is falling, sell sooner to preserve value. Otherwise, wait until close to deadline for the latest injury and lineup news before confirming the swap.