Last refreshed
Rice → Schade
Replacement analysis by price, form and transfer momentum.
Moving from Rice to Schade saves £1.2m in budget and gains 19 total points on the season. Schade currently sits at 12.6% ownership compared to Rice's 11.3%, suggesting the community already favours the replacement.
In recent gameweeks, Schade averages a form rating of 12.0 compared to Rice's 3.5, giving the incoming player a clear edge on recent output. Net transfer activity this gameweek shows Schade at 456,893 net vs Rice at -100,552 net, reflecting the current market sentiment around both assets.
Arsenal
BrentfordFrequently Asked Questions
Should I replace Rice with Schade in FPL?
Schade has a form rating of 12.0 compared to Rice's 3.5, suggesting the move is justified by recent performance. Schade costs £6.2m vs Rice's £7.4m.
How does Schade compare to Rice on points?
Schade has 39 total points this season vs Rice's 20 points. Schade leads by 19 points overall.
Is Schade worth the price over Rice?
Schade costs £6.2m while Rice costs £7.4m — a difference of £1.2m. You save £1.2m which could fund upgrades elsewhere.
What are the transfer trends for Rice and Schade?
Rice has a net transfer flow of -100,552 this gameweek, while Schade has 456,893 net transfers. Positive momentum for Schade suggests managers are backing this move.
When is the best time to make the Rice to Schade transfer?
If Schade (£6.2m) is rising in price, transfer early to lock in the price. If Rice (£7.4m) is falling, sell sooner to preserve value. Otherwise, wait until close to deadline for the latest injury and lineup news before confirming the swap.