Last refreshed
Sarr → Ødegaard
Replacement analysis by price, form and transfer momentum.
Moving from Sarr to Ødegaard saves £0.0m in budget and gains 11 total points on the season. Ødegaard currently sits at 9.6% ownership compared to Sarr's 4.1%, suggesting the community already favours the replacement.
In recent gameweeks, Ødegaard averages a form rating of 11.0 compared to Sarr's 0.0, giving the incoming player a clear edge on recent output. Net transfer activity this gameweek shows Ødegaard at 92,757 net vs Sarr at -52,710 net, reflecting the current market sentiment around both assets.
| Metric | Sarr | Ødegaard |
|---|---|---|
| Club |  Crystal Palace |  Arsenal |
| Price | £6.5m | £6.5m |
| Form | 0.0 | 11.0 |
| Points | 0 | 11 |
| Net Transfers (GW) | -52,710 | 92,757 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Should I replace Sarr with Ødegaard in FPL?
Ødegaard has a form rating of 11.0 compared to Sarr's 0.0, suggesting the move is justified by recent performance. Ødegaard costs £6.5m vs Sarr's £6.5m.
How does Ødegaard compare to Sarr on points?
Ødegaard has 11 total points this season vs Sarr's 0 points. Ødegaard leads by 11 points overall.
Is Ødegaard worth the price over Sarr?
Ødegaard costs £6.5m while Sarr costs £6.5m — a difference of £0.0m. You save £0.0m which could fund upgrades elsewhere.
What are the transfer trends for Sarr and Ødegaard?
Sarr has a net transfer flow of -52,710 this gameweek, while Ødegaard has 92,757 net transfers. Positive momentum for Ødegaard suggests managers are backing this move.
When is the best time to make the Sarr to Ødegaard transfer?
If Ødegaard (£6.5m) is rising in price, transfer early to lock in the price. If Sarr (£6.5m) is falling, sell sooner to preserve value. Otherwise, wait until close to deadline for the latest injury and lineup news before confirming the swap.