Last refreshed
Watkins → Havertz
Replacement analysis by price, form and transfer momentum.
Moving from Watkins to Havertz saves £0.5m in budget and gains 6 total points on the season. Havertz currently sits at 6.3% ownership compared to Watkins's 10.1%, meaning the swap could serve as a differential move.
In recent gameweeks, Havertz averages a form rating of 6.0 compared to Watkins's 0.0, giving the incoming player a clear edge on recent output. Net transfer activity this gameweek shows Havertz at 57,916 net vs Watkins at -42,291 net, reflecting the current market sentiment around both assets.
| Metric | Watkins | Havertz |
|---|---|---|
| Club |  Aston Villa |  Arsenal |
| Price | £8.0m | £7.5m |
| Form | 0.0 | 6.0 |
| Points | 0 | 6 |
| Net Transfers (GW) | -42,291 | 57,916 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Should I replace Watkins with Havertz in FPL?
Havertz has a form rating of 6.0 compared to Watkins's 0.0, suggesting the move is justified by recent performance. Havertz costs £7.5m vs Watkins's £8.0m.
How does Havertz compare to Watkins on points?
Havertz has 6 total points this season vs Watkins's 0 points. Havertz leads by 6 points overall.
Is Havertz worth the price over Watkins?
Havertz costs £7.5m while Watkins costs £8.0m — a difference of £0.5m. You save £0.5m which could fund upgrades elsewhere.
What are the transfer trends for Watkins and Havertz?
Watkins has a net transfer flow of -42,291 this gameweek, while Havertz has 57,916 net transfers. Positive momentum for Havertz suggests managers are backing this move.
When is the best time to make the Watkins to Havertz transfer?
If Havertz (£7.5m) is rising in price, transfer early to lock in the price. If Watkins (£8.0m) is falling, sell sooner to preserve value. Otherwise, wait until close to deadline for the latest injury and lineup news before confirming the swap.