FPL GW4 Review2026/27 GW4 Review how did you do?
Published · refreshed
Hero of the week18.5% owned
Groß made the difference. The template did not.
GW4 was shaped by captaincy outcomes and a few high-impact hauls. The best returns came from managers who trusted role plus fixture, while several popular picks failed to keep pace with the average score.
- Best decisionBacking players with clear routes to points, led by Groß.
- Biggest mistakeCarrying too much exposure to highly owned blanks.
- Next actionCheck fixture quality and minutes security before chasing last week's points.
How the field scored
The average manager scored 69. Around 84 was a useful target for a green arrow; 99+ made it an elite week.
Did the armband deliver?
- 75.2%12→24Missed
João Pedro
CHE· 75.2% owned - 72.3%9→18Missed
Haaland
MCI· 72.3% owned - 50.1%6→12Missed
Calafiori
ARS· 50.1% owned - 41.8%2→4Missed
B.Fernandes
MUN· 41.8% owned - 40.4%14→28Missed
RayaARS· 40.4% owned
Heroes and villains
BRE · 5.9% owned
LEE · 2.9% owned- B.FernandesMUN · 41.8% owned2pts
CherkiMCI · 28.5% owned1pts
MbeumoMUN · 22.9% owned2pts
Widely owned, barely returned: each blank made captaincy and starting-XI choices feel expensive.
Three lessons
- 01
Do not ignore minutes security
The gap between a good pick and a useful pick is often whether the player stays on the pitch long enough to reach bonus and late attacking returns.
- 02
Ownership still changes rank impact
A blank from a highly owned player hurts less than a blank from an isolated differential, but it still blocks green arrows if the alternative hauls.
- 03
Use fixture quality as a tiebreaker
When two players are close, the easier fixture and clearer role should decide the move rather than last week's headline score.
Get the GW5 captain picks
Run an FPLai analysis before your next deadline to turn these lessons into AI-based captain and transfer advice for your squad.